First from Watts Up With That--a post that questions the subjective application of rock-hard journalistic principles.
Secondly from Archbishop Cranmer who suggests that we shouldn't be very surprised that people talk about us behind our backs and that
[...]Wikileaks is a whistleblower’s website, and they appear to have an awful lot of whistles to blow. As these revelations reverberate around the world, it is evident that they serve a purpose.At Volokh, David Bernstein points out that conspiracy theorists must be confounded by the leaks.
It is worth considering what and whose.
It’s quite a blow to conspiracy theorists, is it not, that the combined weight of two of their favor bogeymen, “the Zionists” and “the Arabs” haven’t been able to get the U.S. to take military action against Iran.Finally, at Protein Wisdom, the OUTLAW himself ponders when it was that we stopped treating treason as treason.