MLive Asks: Does West Michigan need more visible minority and gay faces to attract a creative class?
To which I have to ask, what in the heck is a gay face?
You know, gays have that certain...look. Really?
I mean, if I ever tried to define a "gay face" I would be ridiculed as homophobic and a hater. Yet, it would seem to be entirely reasonable for a whole class of artists to be attracted to a community that projects a look that we heterosexuals would be remiss to identify or, absent any obviousities, investigate.
Would it be wrong for masses of unemployed straight guys to pretend overt gayness in order to attract an expansion in the arts? If so, what exactly is overt gayness? Is it any more obvious that a gay face? Could such acting in itself be construed as anti-gay or would it be seen as an act of community bonding?
These are questions that only those in chosen identity groups should ask or answer and I renounce myself for the queries.
So, how long will we have to wait before a government sponsored job-training program is launched to attract any related industries?